Make sure that you are well familiar with it and that your software supports UTF-8 smoothly.Īccording to Wikipedia, XTerm supports UTF-8. UTF-8 is the way in which Unicode is used under Unix, Linux, and similar systems. ![]() With the UTF-8 encoding, Unicode can be used in a convenient and backwards compatible way in environments that were designed entirely around ASCII, like Unix. We'd also get a consistent look (font) and feel (input method) imposed on all CUI applications. If we get our terminal to render and input Unicode, all the CUI applications can simply rely on that function provided by their operating environment (terminal) and will only need minor changes. On Sun, at 06:14:23PM +0100, Chris Boyle wrote: > Package: xterm > Version: 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 > Severity: important > Line 5 of /usr/X11R6/bin/uxterm is: > programxterm > If the x-terminal-emulator alternative is pointed at uxterm, then > launching just 'xterm' runs uxterm again (since /usr/bin/xterm -> /etc/alternatives/x. Unicode support must be coupled with the right font for all characters to be displayed correctly. Sometimes it's useful to have unicode support for programs that expect it. If you want to send me a direct message with a explanation, I will be happy to discuss further the URL and web site.See comparison between rxvt and XTerm running Elinks (Gnome Terminal and XTerm with true type fonts in the second screenshot). ![]() So we generally ask people to not put URL's in their signatures that are not personal, or related to technology/linux in some way as it could be misinterpreted as spam, and people have been blocked for that. Please specify 32 or 64bit in your questions, and please remove the URL from your signature block as its not linux related, does not appear to be a personal web site but business related (maybe your business?), and not related to technology. take a look at terminator.Ĭouple other quick notes. If you are interested in a more feature rich terminal that does things like split windows, etc. So unless you have a specific application or question regarding terminal performance I suggest removing xterm from synaptic or removing the menu entries if they are causing confusion and just use lxterminal for LXDE. (So this is not a debate place for terminals - roxterm,xterm,uxterm,urxvt,terminator,tilda, etc) You are using the bash shell regardless of terminal choice - So unless you are programming or have other specific needs the average user uses whats included as the default. The average desktop user does not do much in the terminal except use it when a GUI does not meet their needs for what they are trying to accomplish. I will look into that for R9 and I am not sure about changing the code specific to the terminal as its a utility.Īs far as what terminal works best for your environment? Thats a debate that could go on forever. The cleanup that probably would be easiest is to simply remove the menu entries for both xterm and uxterm and remove said confusion. If you go look at the package in synaptic (xterm) you will see it says as much in the description, and when xterm is installed, uxterm is as well. Its a wrapper around xterm to provide locale and UTF-8. uxterm is not a separate package (even though it has its own binay). (and I have not changed that code) I considered removing and changing the code before releasing R8, but it was left as is as it added negligible space and overhead and the effort and time made it an easy decision.ģ. xterm is required as the installer uses it and its coded to do as such. LXterminal comes with LXDE as part of the desktop environment so its included in the install and its a servicable terminal and functions well within LXDE. To delete the folder, type the below-mentioned command in terminal: sudo rm -rf Steam.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |